Monday, May 20, 2019
Literature Review on Employability of Women Essay
Employability of Wo handsIntroductionEmployability in relation to gender, age and race has changed significantly entirely over the forms as factors of our society change the way we live and take on. As social norms change, so does the tincture of employability. History proves that the employability of women in relation to men has progressively shifted in recent years, as women become increasingly attractive to employers. In the past, it was thought that it was harder for women to gain a line of merchandise than it was for men, however is this the case in our innovational day society? In the past, women bring been penalised with lower pay and slight moments than men still recent history has stopped these things from occurring with new laws and regulations for employers to follow, such as the fair to middling Pay Act 1970, which bequeath be looked at in more detail in the review.This literature review will attempt to give way the differences in the past, and those which are st fitted apparent straight out between the employability of men and women. Is it harder for a cleaning woman to channel a job than a man? Firstly, it will cover the history of employability of women. Then the review will try to discover when things started to change and women started to become more employ subject. Following this it will discuss the employability of women in todays society. Lastly, will be a conclusion, in which the findings will be reviewed.History of employability of womenPrior to the stake valet de chambre contend, at that place was a certain stereotype that women were housewives social roles were clearly defined. A womans place was at home, while a man should be at work. It was acceptable for a woman to work outside of the home, providing she did not know a family to look after, but she would concur been paid slight than a man, even when doing the same job. The mho World War changed everything. As the men left to go to fight, the women had to run the home alone, but they also had to get apply to going to work.However, It was understood without the war that what Britains women were doing was re altogethery a mans job. So m any of them were dismissed from their work once peace was declared In industries that were not heavily unionised, however, some women were kept on not least because they were cheaper to employ than men. (Harris, 2011). Despite all of the work the women did during the war, they were calm down not truly appreciated and in fact the housewife stereotype was slake more or less in the 1970s, probably due to the men redress the majority of the work once returning from the war. This is backed up by the Women and Employment Survey in 1980, The collection of employment histories in the Women and Employment Survey (WES) in 1980 started to break down the stereotypes still around in the 1970s about womens careers. The tendency had been to think that a womans important role was as a m early(a), running(a) a t domestic tasks. (Scott, Dex and Joshi, 2008).Even though the stereotype had keep into the 1970s, it was clear that it was slowly fading, the effort put in by the women during the war was starting to be appreciated, and as a result women were starting to become more employable, as shown by the fact that women constituted 29 per cent of the labour force in Britain in 1911, and 29 per cent in 1951, but this had go up to 34 per cent by 1966 and had reached 43 per cent by 1991 (Crompton, 1997).In the early 1990s the fast improver in the employment of women started to level out. This was largely due to the recession between 1990 and 1992, as the younger, less stable women chose to go back to school rather than memorizek employment in the recessionary job market. After 1992 though at that place was a strong economic recovery, which in turn, led to the rise of women in employment, to what it is today.When did it all start to change?The gender composition of the labour force has chan ged considerably in the twentieth century. in the beginning the Second World War over 90 per cent of all men of working age or more were in employment, and that was mostly unchanged until after the War, but since then the share of men in employment steadily declined to notwithstanding 73 per cent in 1991. On the other hand, Womens employment has moved in the other direction. Up until the Second World War (1951) but about a third of all women of working age or more were economically active. Since 1951, however, womens employment has been growing steadily, and by 1991 half of all women of working age or more were economically active. (Crompton, 1997).There are a few major sources for this shift in employability, the first being the Second World War, which went some way towards changing the stereotypes about a womans role and reservation them more employable, as they showed that they were capable of doing the same jobs as a man just as salubrious as they could, if not better in s ome cases. This has been relieveed in more detail previously. However, the main reason for the enormous rise in employability of women has to be the introduction of the disturb Pay Act in 1970.The Equal Pay Act 1970 has had a dramatic effect on the way fe young-begetting(prenominal) employees are viewed and the bill of money they are paid, in relation to men over the extreme forty years Before 1970, it was common practice in the private sector and some parts of the public sector for there to be separate, and lower, womens rates of pay The Equal Pay Act introduced an implied equality clause into all employees contracts. This had the effect of eliminating separate lower womens rates of pay womens intermediate earnings compared to mens rose by 5%, from 72% to 77%, over a 5 year period in the 1970s the biggest ever increase in this ratio. (Hastings).This was not the solely change the Equal Pay Act 1970 caused. The Act also led to the use of job evaluation being used for more frequ ently, this is where you compare different jobs in order to put them into a rank order ground on the difficulty of the work, this would then be the basis for the employees grading and pay, and not the fact that they were a male or female. There were other effects of the Act as well, such as that of the effect on collective bargaining. Over the years there have been many changes in technology and the way businesses are run which has led to the old collective bargaining arrangements becoming out-dated, but it is not only because of the changes in technology, equal pay legislation has also had an impact. Due to these factors, collective bargaining arrangements in many organisations have been harmonised.Employability of women in todays societySince the Equal Pay Act was passed, the gap between the average hourly pay of men and that of women has drastically decreased. However, It is 40 years since the Equal Pay Act and except women working full-time in the UK are still paid on average 15.5% less per hour than men That is one of the biggest gaps in the European Union and Britain appears to be becoming a tougher place still for women to work. The recession has collide withn many part-time jobs go the majority of such jobs are held by women. Over the last 12 months, 4.5% of the female workforce experienced redundancy compared with just 3% of men. (Allen, 2011), illustrating that despite the vast increase in the employability of women, a difference still exists today, albeit a considerably smaller one.In todays society, it has been shown that girls remain in education for longer than boys, and also acquire higher grades. This could help to further explain why women are far more employable now than they have been in the past, and this trend only looks to continue in the future. Yet, the reason for the rise in employability of women today is it not only due to the laws that have been imposed it is also due to the change in status of women in todays society. As, women have become more powerful, it is clear that businesses should employ more women and treat them equally to their male workers, if not only to protect themselves from law suits, then to enhance the reputation and customer base of their business and depict the reap the rewards financially. Research in Europe and the United States suggests that companies with several senior-level women tend to perform better financially. (Georges, Sandrine, Mary C., 2008). remainderBy looking through the history and changes of female employability and at what it is like today, you can clearly see how society has gradually changed their views from the sexist view that was adopted by men, and some women, before the Second World War, to the very much equal society we have today. However, is it really equal in todays society? The research shows, that despite the colossal rise in the employability of women and slight decline in the employability of men, there are still some differences, for example the fac t that women working full-time in the UK are still paid on average 15.5% less per hour than men (Allen, 2011), this is not acceptable, but unfortunately there may always be a difference, even if it is a very slight one.ReferencesAllen, K. (2011) Women look away now you are working for free The Guardian, 4th November 2011 Online Accessed 14 November 2011Crompton, R. (1997) Women and Work in Modern Britain. second Impression Edition, Oxford OUP OxfordDesvaux, G., Devillard-Hoellinger, S., Meaney, M. (2008) A business case for women. Mckinsey Quarterly. Issue 4, p26-33Harris, C. (2011) Women Under Fire in World War Two BBC, 17th February 2011 Online Accessed 14 November 2011Hastings, S. The Equal Pay Act Its Impact on incorporated Bargaining, Grading and Pay Online Accessed 14 November 2011Scott, J., Dex, S., Joshi, H. (2009) Women and Employment Changing Lives and New Challenges. Edward Edgar Publishing LtdReflective ReportHow I found Literature Review.My first thoughts when being set this assignment were ones of panic and anxiety. I was a pocketable apprehensive of how to approach it as I was unsure about what it consisted of, and how to go about writing it. This tutelage was increased as it was the first assignment I have been set since joining the university so I was not sure whether it would be up to the standards of the university. As I started to get into the review, it started to become easier, although, I did still have trouble with the referencing, and was uncertain of the best way to layout the review. I found turnitin very easy to use, and I liked the idea of being able to check my work was acceptable before finally submitting it. On the whole though I feel that this assignment, although challenging, was extremely worthwhile and will stand me in fair stead for the future, especially using turnitin as I will now easily be able to hand in my future assignments.Meeting my mentor.My mentor rung me and we arranged to meet at the mobile canteen in Mi thras House. My first impressions of James were that he seemed a very nice approachable guy, which, indeed he was. We started talking and he asked me how I was finding University life, both the social side of it and the work load. I responded by telling him that I was very much enjoying the social side of university as I have enjoyed encounter all new people and making new friends. I then proceeded to add that I was finding some of the workload quite hard as it is a big step up from A-levels, but also that I found it all extremely interesting, especially the Marketing, Law and Economic elements of the course, which has made it easier to engage up on it as I am interesting in it.Subsequently, we then mutually heady on some goals that I could set myself, they were as follows Firstly, we set the target that I must achieve a high 2.1 or a 1st at the end of the course. Secondly, was the target that I must find a job. The last target was that I must meet all of my deadlines and attend all of my lectures and seminars, unless there were extenuating circumstances. James then gave me his e-mail address and told me to contact him if I needed any help with anything in the future. Lastly, we arranged another date to meet and then we both parted ways. in the flesh(predicate) SWOTWhat are my strengths? What do I already have that I might be able to build on?I feel that one of my strengths is my existing knowledge of businesses and how they operate. I gained this knowledge through research I conducted in A-Level. Good Presentation is another thing I view as a strength of mine. What are my weaknesses / areas for development?I believe my main weakness is the speed at which I work. This directly contrasts with one of my strengths (Good presentation) as I try to make everything look neat and then spend longer than I should on the work. What opportunities do you see to develop yourself?I have a vast amount of opportunities available to me at Brighton University.These opportun ities include Teachers to give me advice when I get stuck on something, Libraries so I can easily find the books/journals I might need to help me write my essays, separate students who I can ask for their input on my work and how I could improve it (Peer Review) What threats do you see to your personal development, or barriers that may need to be overcome?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment