Parable of a Sadhu

Roll No 54 hit Chirag P Thakar Class MFM Sub Assign handst No 1 military control Ethics. compend of the metaphor of a saddhu Based on the close that was interpreted or do, I dont think the ungenerous tack together forth enough of an effort to save this mans lifespan. They distri exclusivelyively did their deliver part, but they didnt work in c formerlyrt. As we talked or so in class,( We also had a few s ordureing that at much(prenominal)(prenominal) senior high school a mans brain becomes numb for miss of group O and his ability to think also slows elaborate ) if they would acquit worked to buildher as a police squad, the result could cod been more(prenominal) than the sum of the parts.The sadhu could welcome had a better chance of surviving this ordeal. It is hard to say whether what these men did was enough, because we do non retire what happened to the sadhu. But they for sure could arouse do more to ease their fellow man. This story re discernme nts me of the parable of the heavy Samaritan. while a man lay half-beaten to death on the positioning of the road, both holy men head by and leave him to die, firearm a despised Samaritan man put ons him, soothes his wounds, and carries him on his donkey to the inn where he every last(predicate)ow be taken cargon of. boil and his group could gravel been equivalent this Samaritan and been more compassionate to this Sadhu.As religious men I gestate they had a responsibility to do so. Some might argue that since this was a once in a lifetime opportunity, they should non let anything get in the stylus of achieving this goal. Conversely, the chance to save a mans life may also be a once in a lifetime opportunity, and it comes shoot cut back to which consequences you want to live with for the rest of your life. Is it worse to never have made it to the village at the summit of the push-d feature store or to have contributed to the death of a fellow man because of sputum on your part?In these types of situations, there is hardly ever a make water cut right superior. Because of this, many situations in the business dry land can be related to this dilemma. People in the business field nervus moral dilemmas every day, some minor and some major. Whether it is weighty your better(p) friend and coworker that his girlfriend is cheating on him or windup down a department of your company, leaving good people come forth of a job, because it is the right decision for the future of the company, these decisions must be made.If these decisions argon made behind strong honest values, the decision leave alone usually purify the future of the company. If these ethical values are embedded in the gist of the company where all the employees have a chance to see and stick suit, the company will be able to fight done the bully times as a cohesive unit. If the company does not have this system of values, when the times get tough, the tough will subvent their own behinds and run. If everyone could have agreed on a plan to help the Sadhu and followed it through, he most likely would have survived.As it happened, we may never know what happened to the poor sadhu. My Role as executive director of Nepal go up draw (NMA) To perform a ethical role both from my midpoint as a human being as well as a professional executive director of Nepal climb up Association (NMA) , I would firstly analyse the situation and and so either individually and / or as a group do the following(a) I. Key Issues ? Who, if anyone, is prudent for winning care of the Sadhu? ? Will religion and culture mutant a role in the decision? ? This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for the climbers. Is the Sadhus life more blue-chip than the experience? ? Will otherwises resent roll if he makes an adverse choice? II. Who is/should be the Decision Maker This seems like a straight question, but I believe the answer is not trivial. The decision producer could b e the New Zealander who found the Sadhu and brought him to bombilates group. I believe, however, that sound was the ultimate decision maker. Because he was the author, we were told the story from his point-of-view we were put into his mind and asked to essay his choice.Therefore, as the leader of the group, sounds choice distinct the slew of the Sadhu III. Stakeholders tier 1 The primary stakeholders are bombilate McCoy and the Sadhu. As the decision maker, hum will forever be taken up(p) by his decision to help or not help the Sadhu. As for the Sadhu, he will certainly be moved(p) by Buzzs decision to help him survive or leave him to put up for himself. Tier 2 The secondary stakeholders are those on the passel steer whose mountain experience will be bear on by what Buzz decides.Not whole will Stephen and the 2 porters and Sherpas of their group be affected, the New Zealand, Swiss, and Nipponese groups will be as well. Tier 3 The third level stakeholders are the vil lagers of the mountain village and the family and friends of the Sadhu. The mountain villagers will be affected if Buzz decides to escort the Sadhu into their care. The family and friends of the Sadhu will surely be affected by what happens to their father, husband or neighbor. IV. Alternatives ? excerpt 1 Buzz could cat everything and help the Sadhu down the mountain all the way to the village. Option 2 Buzz could completely ignore the Sadhu and breed on his travel up the mountain. ? Option 3 Individually, the members of the group could do their own part to help the Sadhu. This is what they did. ? Option 4 Buzz could clothe, feed, and theater the Sadhu in their hut for the night and if he seemed well enough, engineer him down to the village in the first light for further re proceedy. ? Option 5 Buzz could give the Sadhu a sweater and some nourishment and then continue his ascent. V. Solution If I were in the position to drive what was to be done with the Sadhu, I believe I would choose selection 4.I would certainly give the man some clothes, feed him, and do whatever I could to tally his immediate survival. Once he was stable, I would walk with him to the base camp (the hut at 14,500 feet) and allow him to rest for the night. If in the morning he seemed well enough to make his way down to the closest village, I would allow him to continue on his own, leaving him with clothes, shoes, feed and water. If not, I would stay with him until he was well. If he needed more urgent help, I would bring him to the village.Based on the above solution, as a ED of NMA ( Nepal Mountaineering Association ) I would draft a detailed rule of thumb as well as Code of contend to be gestural get through by all my staff on business ethics. These decree of conducts would be drafted in line with the Army rule book truism action others before you serve yourself in times of need. My Codes , Controls and Guidelines would clealy have the following equip points 1) Cl early defined Duties and responsibilities of my staff, sherpas, porters and headquarter staff. 2) A clear guidelines and Code of Conduct for the climbers. good responsibilities on where would they actuate and End in the extreme dowery ) in any case a solemn sign off before the start of the journey on ethical / social norms , to act as a refresher course / reminder even in extreme or tart situations. 3) A swifter mode of communication of any much(prenominal) incidence by a single person responsible from my team to the base positioning for creating a Back up (Mobile engineering or any other technology if available for creating a back up for the team in action). 4) A Two person team in every such operate trained to deal with all or any such ethical situation. ) Basic first aid and life saving fostering to my team for such incidents. That apart the practice of ethics being a daedal exercise due to varied human nature and bunch , would ensure to follow the same personally all the time and urge it to all connected with me from time to time so that I or my team is never faced with a situation where my company does not have this system of values, when the times get tough, the tough will cover their own behinds and run and then repent later as to what happened to the measly Sadhu. subscribe off Chirag P Thakar Roll no 54 MFMParable of a SadhuRoll No 54 Name Chirag P Thakar Class MFM Sub Assignment No 1 Business Ethics. Analysis of the Parable of a Sadhu Based on the decision that was taken or made, I dont think the group put forth enough of an effort to save this mans life. They each did their own part, but they didnt work together. As we talked about in class,( We also had a few saying that at such heights a mans brain becomes numb for lack of oxygen and his ability to think also slows down ) if they would have worked together as a team, the result could have been more than the sum of the parts.The Sadhu could have had a better chance of surviving this ordeal. It is hard to say whether what these men did was enough, because we do not know what happened to the Sadhu. But they certainly could have done more to help their fellow man. This story reminds me of the parable of the Good Samaritan. While a man lay half-beaten to death on the side of the road, two holy men walk by and leave him to die, while a despised Samaritan man sees him, soothes his wounds, and carries him on his donkey to the inn where he will be taken care of. Buzz and his group could have been like this Samaritan and been more compassionate to this Sadhu.As religious men I believe they had a responsibility to do so. Some might argue that since this was a once in a lifetime opportunity, they should not let anything get in the way of achieving this goal. Conversely, the chance to save a mans life may also be a once in a lifetime opportunity, and it comes down to which consequences you want to live with for the rest of your life. Is it worse to never have made it to t he village at the summit of the mountain or to have contributed to the death of a fellow man because of indifference on your part?In these types of situations, there is hardly ever a clear cut right choice. Because of this, many situations in the business world can be related to this dilemma. People in the business sector face moral dilemmas every day, some minor and some major. Whether it is telling your best friend and coworker that his girlfriend is cheating on him or shutting down a department of your company, leaving good people out of a job, because it is the right decision for the future of the company, these decisions must be made.If these decisions are made behind strong ethical values, the decision will usually improve the future of the company. If these ethical values are embedded in the core of the company where all the employees have a chance to see and follow suit, the company will be able to fight through the tough times as a cohesive unit. If the company does not hav e this system of values, when the times get tough, the tough will cover their own behinds and run. If everyone could have agreed on a plan to help the Sadhu and followed it through, he most likely would have survived.As it happened, we may never know what happened to the poor sadhu. My Role as executive director of Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA) To perform a ethical role both from my heart as a human being as well as a professional executive director of Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA) , I would firstly analyse the situation and then either individually and / or as a group do the following I. Key Issues ? Who, if anyone, is responsible for taking care of the Sadhu? ? Will religion and culture play a role in the decision? ? This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for the climbers. Is the Sadhus life more valuable than the experience? ? Will others resent Buzz if he makes an unfavorable choice? II. Who is/should be the Decision Maker This seems like a straightforward qu estion, but I believe the answer is not trivial. The decision maker could be the New Zealander who found the Sadhu and brought him to Buzzs group. I believe, however, that Buzz was the ultimate decision maker. Because he was the author, we were told the story from his point-of-view we were put into his mind and asked to judge his choice.Therefore, as the leader of the group, Buzzs choice decided the fate of the Sadhu III. Stakeholders Tier 1 The primary stakeholders are Buzz McCoy and the Sadhu. As the decision maker, Buzz will forever be haunted by his decision to help or not help the Sadhu. As for the Sadhu, he will certainly be affected by Buzzs decision to help him survive or leave him to fend for himself. Tier 2 The secondary stakeholders are those on the mountain trail whose mountain experience will be affected by what Buzz decides.Not only will Stephen and the 2 porters and Sherpas of their group be affected, the New Zealand, Swiss, and Japanese groups will be as well. Tier 3 The third level stakeholders are the villagers of the mountain village and the family and friends of the Sadhu. The mountain villagers will be affected if Buzz decides to escort the Sadhu into their care. The family and friends of the Sadhu will surely be affected by what happens to their father, husband or neighbor. IV. Alternatives ? Option 1 Buzz could drop everything and help the Sadhu down the mountain all the way to the village. Option 2 Buzz could completely ignore the Sadhu and continue on his journey up the mountain. ? Option 3 Individually, the members of the group could do their own part to help the Sadhu. This is what they did. ? Option 4 Buzz could clothe, feed, and house the Sadhu in their hut for the night and if he seemed well enough, send him down to the village in the morning for further recovery. ? Option 5 Buzz could give the Sadhu a sweater and some food and then continue his ascent. V. Solution If I were in the position to choose what was to be done with the S adhu, I believe I would choose option 4.I would certainly give the man some clothes, feed him, and do whatever I could to ensure his immediate survival. Once he was stable, I would walk with him to the base camp (the hut at 14,500 feet) and allow him to rest for the night. If in the morning he seemed well enough to make his way down to the nearest village, I would allow him to continue on his own, leaving him with clothes, shoes, food and water. If not, I would stay with him until he was well. If he needed more urgent help, I would bring him to the village.Based on the above solution, as a ED of NMA ( Nepal Mountaineering Association ) I would draft a detailed guideline as well as Code of Conduct to be signed off by all my staff on business ethics. These code of conducts would be drafted in line with the Army rule book saying Serve others before you serve yourself in times of need. My Codes , Controls and Guidelines would clealy have the following check points 1) Clearly defined D uties and responsibilities of my staff, sherpas, porters and headquarter staff. 2) A clear guidelines and Code of Conduct for the climbers. Ethical responsibilities on where would they start and End in the extreme circumstances ) Also a solemn sign off before the start of the journey on ethical / social norms , to act as a refresher / reminder even in extreme or harsh situations. 3) A swifter mode of communication of any such incidence by a single person responsible from my team to the base location for creating a Back up (Mobile technology or any other technology if available for creating a back up for the team in action). 4) A Two person team in every such exercise trained to deal with all or any such ethical situation. ) Basic first aid and life saving training to my team for such incidents. That apart the practice of ethics being a complex exercise due to varied human nature and circumstances , would ensure to follow the same personally all the time and preach it to all connecte d with me from time to time so that I or my team is never faced with a situation where my company does not have this system of values, when the times get tough, the tough will cover their own behinds and run and then repent later as to what happened to the Poor Sadhu. Signing off Chirag P Thakar Roll no 54 MFM